discussion of candidates for election in Massachusetts. Voters are
disgusted with the one-sided extremism of the uniformly right-wing,
Tea Party newspapers, radio stations, television stations and myopic
racist, homophobic internet news sites and academic panel discussions
in the Commonwealth. None of them report the compassion and wisdom of
Democratic Party candidates. In the wilderness there's David Bernstein
who points out what few voters recognize, Scott Brown is not a woman.
There are more women than men in the Commonwealth. It is a no brainer
(Really?) that women are victims and a minority. Women need special
treatment by men so that they can regain their historical position
controlling the mechanisms of power. Women will wisely replace the old
boys network with a new and improved old girls network. Women will win
this Senate election in order to restore honor to the Edward M.
Kennedy Traditional US Senate seat. If women vote only for women they
will take control of the state legislature, city councils, mayors
offices, the nine congressional seats and both US Senate seats. Men
cannot stop this from happening. We're women. We're here. Get used to
it! (Gasp!)
Bernstein reminds Massachusetts voters that Todd Akin and Scott
Brown are Xerox copies of each other. The issues in Massachusetts are
exactly the same ones in . . . what is the state where Akin runs?
Well, the issues are the same. Take Bernstein's word for it. And Akin
and Brown are both loser men. Neither of them are (looser?) women. But
Bernstein reveals that Elizabeth Warren is a women and she will get
the votes of women as long as they are aware of how much Scott Brown
hates women. Bernstein explains how deeply Brown hates women.
Bernstein did not reveal Scott Brown's answer when he asked if he
still beats his wife. But we all know the answer.
Statistics provided by Bernstein show that only two percent of
Americans will be represented by Republican women Senators. But 40
percent of Americans will have a Democratic woman US Senator.
Bernstein says voters (men and women) should vote for more Democrats
to increase the number of people represented by women Democrats. That
makes sense. (It does?)
Mr. Bernstein reports that Washington Republicans [. . .] "embody
female exclusion." Is that a disease that needs taxpayer research
funding? In Massachusetts Scott Brown encourages "embodying female
exclusion." It is easy to show how much Brown hates women. For more
objective facts Bernstein quotes the Democratic Party Chairman in
Massachusetts, who knows Scott Brown. The Chairman says, "Scott Brown
votes the other way." Icing this cake of reason is the fact that
Elizabeth Warren provides enough femininity "to taint Brown by
association." So there. Ipso facto presto chango. Brown hates women.
Bernsetin emphasizes the most important consideration for all voters.
When they enter the voting booth, the one thing all voters ask
themselves is: "Which of these candidates are more likely to be a
woman?"
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/
G(rand) O(ld) P(ricks)
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
October 15, 2012
Boston Phoenix
