Is this another effort made up by the PR firm for the psychiatric industry and the drug companies? How can illnesses with no pathology, that are created by consensus not science have any genetic link? This is nonsense published on a site called New Scientist. Does that include new methodology, making up scientific conclusions out of thin air? What is with these people? Will this be allowed into evidence by clueless judges who fear accountability?
[From article]
"Although it's widely agreed that genetics are involved in mental illness,"
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/08/an-insanity-defence-for-jared.html
Does science support an insanity defence for Loughner?
11:35 19 August 2011
Jeff Hecht, contributor
New Scientist
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment