Showing posts with label Discretion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Discretion. Show all posts

August 27, 2015

De-Policing The Latest Propaganda Tool To Increase Crime and Violence





[From article]
“Ten years ago, when we stopped a suspect in a black neighborhood, that person had two choices: Run or comply,” said a Chicago cop. “But now more and more suspects are refusing to comply with lawful orders to take their hands out of their pockets, or produce a driver’s license, or answer simple questions about what they are doing in that neighborhood with a bulging backpack at 1:30 a.m. And they know we can’t or won’t do anything about it. Defiance is now the rule.”
Cops are targets today like never before. The black hostility towards police is open, mainstream, and unapologetic.
And increasing. Jailhouse legal scholars fill the internet, explaining why it is alright to disobey lawful commands. And how, if that does not work, “shoot, ‘em. Kill ‘em.”
[. . .]
But cops know better.
They do not fool themselves about the consequences of surrendering large swaths of dangerous places to black criminality.
It sounds bad out there, your intrepid correspondent asked a cop. “Not really. Not yet. Bad is coming.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/08/8_5_2015_16_10.html

August 7, 2015
De-Policing: the Scariest Word of the Year
By Colin Flaherty

May 5, 2015

Cambridge, MA Police Ignore Residency Laws





Cambridge is covered by the Obama-Holder doctrine, i.e., inconvenient laws may be ignored by selected persons. Not a problem. And then there is (if necessary) prosecutor discretion. 

http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20150501/NEWS/150509701

Cambridge Police Department not prioritizing residency law
By Sara Feijo
sfeijo (at) wickedlocal.com
Posted May. 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle

December 16, 2013

Gun Laws Unenforced by Sheriffs in Colorado, Elsewhere




[From article]
Some sheriffs, like Sheriff Cooke, are refusing to enforce the laws, saying that they are too vague and violate Second Amendment rights. Many more say that enforcement will be “a very low priority,” as several sheriffs put it. All but seven of the 62 elected sheriffs in Colorado signed on in May to a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the statutes.
[. . .]
In New York State, where Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo signed one of the toughest gun law packages in the nation last January, two sheriffs have said publicly they would not enforce the laws — inaction that Mr. Cuomo said would set “a dangerous and frightening precedent.”

If Obama can enforce or not enforce sections of his signature health care law, why is it a problem for Sheriffs to decline to enforce laws they do not like? Law enforcement agencies have legal discretion about what laws to enforce. The president is obligated to enforce the laws by the Constitution. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/us/sheriffs-refuse-to-enforce-laws-on-gun-control.html?_r=0

Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce Laws on Gun Control
By ERICA GOODE
Published: December 15, 2013