Women have sufficient influence in the nation, in courts and among legislatures that they can have an abortion, take birth control pills. The government was persuaded to stay out of the bedroom and off their bodies. Homosexuals convinced national leaders that the five-thousand-year ban on same sex should be repealed and was. Black Americans demanded and got special privileges for not suffering any harm, and to punish white people who did no wrong. All of this in the name of fairness.
People who are accused of a made up illnesses, protected speech and behavior that psychiatrists and psychologists do not like or do not understand, are forced to accept treatment that will not "cure" their "illness." This taxpayer funded business sells treatment, not cures. It is the fastest growing business in the nation, especially because taxpayers fund this abusive violation of human bodies in the name of good. The same organizations which import drugs into the country, are creating non profit corporations to treat the use of those drugs. It is a great business model. Maybe they got the idea from the Savings and Loan scandal. Criminal organizations bankrupted small banks. The same lawyers and accountants were paid with taxpayer funds to fix the problem they created. Ahem! You have to admire the creativity of psychiatrists who make up illnesses out of thin air. See e.g., Boston University Psychology Professor Margaret Hagan's book, Whores of The Court. Clueless politicians repeat their nonsense appearing to be knowledgeable. They seldom are but young people keep appearing who believe what the politicians and the psychiatrists say. It is a repeating pattern. How can punishment be treatment? Is this more Stalinist doctrine?
[From article]
There is a consensus research literature that says, in summary, that coerced treatment often helps.
[This sounds similar to the "consensus" that creates mental illness, and Al Gore's consensus of believers in computer models.]
The Senator adds:
We have all been dragged to a meeting or entertainment venue and suddenly found that we are getting something out of it. But I think we need to be very cautious about expanding forced treatment.
[Is this how science works?]
My [legal] clients taught me a lot about what coercion means and completely changed my perspective on the issue.
[. . .]
his bill would give physicians the power to “pink slip” persons with addictions and hold them for treatment as they now can hold people with major mental illness.
[. . .]
it may transform hospitals into places that most persons with addictions will want to stay away from.
[. . .]
the approach that is emerging from the legislature's Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse [. . .] would push hospitals to evaluate people who overdose and to offer them treatment, but would not add new coercion mechanisms.
http://cambridge.wickedlocal.com/article/20160123/NEWS/160129122
Column: Keeping addiction treatment voluntary
By Sen. Will Brownsberger
Posted Jan. 23, 2016 at 10:15 AM
CAMBRIDGE Chronicle
No comments:
Post a Comment