November 28, 2008
Beyond Rent Control
Beyond Rent Control
[This letter was published in The New York Times on November 28, 1994]
To the Editor:
Your Nov. 22 article about the Massachusetts referendum on the issue of rent control reports inaccurately the outcome of the vote: "Only Boston, Brookline and Cambridge voted -- in large numbers -- to keep rent control legal. The rest of the state voted to abolish it."
At least New Bedford, Springfield and Fall River also voted to let municipalities impose rent control.
Just as the Federal Government takes power from states contrary to the 10th Amendment, states are usurping local powers. It is typical of the arbitrary application of legal doctrine that is widespread in the land.
ROY BERCAW Cambridge, Mass., Nov. 23, 1994
[This letter was published in The New York Times on November 28, 1994]
To the Editor:
Your Nov. 22 article about the Massachusetts referendum on the issue of rent control reports inaccurately the outcome of the vote: "Only Boston, Brookline and Cambridge voted -- in large numbers -- to keep rent control legal. The rest of the state voted to abolish it."
At least New Bedford, Springfield and Fall River also voted to let municipalities impose rent control.
Just as the Federal Government takes power from states contrary to the 10th Amendment, states are usurping local powers. It is typical of the arbitrary application of legal doctrine that is widespread in the land.
ROY BERCAW Cambridge, Mass., Nov. 23, 1994
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment