September 2, 2007

Trust Us, We're Biotech!

Trust Us, We're Biotech!

Trust us we're biotech companies! How can the Cambridge Chronicle question
the methods and procedures of a biotech company? Are any reporters experts? Huh?
(Editorial, "We deserve to know GateHouse News Service, Aug 30, 2007) Biotech
companies improve the health and welfare of all persons. Biotech companies make
more food and more varieties available to poor people. Biotech companies cure
illnesses. Biotech companies employ only high-minded ethical researchers who
only do good. Biotech companies never harm humans or rodents.
What is wrong with the people at the Cambridge Chronicle questioning how a
concerned compassionate company stores its chemicals? There are no dangers, only
benefits from the way we store our chemicals. We support diversity, and equal
rights.
We are biotech companies and we want your money. Support Harvard's
Corporate lawyer and Governor, Deval "Cadillac" Patrick's $1 billion promise or
we will leave Cambridge. We want your money. We are biotech companies. If you
can't trust us who can you trust? We'll share your money with the politicians.
We're not greedy.

[See e.g.,

Drug co.: Pass biotech $$ plan or else
By Scott Van Voorhis
Boston Herald Business Reporter
Friday, August 31, 2007 - Updated: 03:30 AM EST

British pharmaceutical giant Shire PLC yesterday warned that plans for a major
drug manufacturing complex in Boston’s suburbs could be in jeopardy unless
Beacon Hill passes a trumpeted, $1 billion incentive package for the life
sciences industry.
...]

Roy Bercaw, Editor, ENOUGH ROOM

Editorial: We deserve to know
GateHouse News Service
Thu Aug 30, 2007, 06:08 AM EDT
Cambridge -
What’s really going on at Idenix Pharmaceuticals?

We couldn’t tell you because we don’t know. The company won’t tell neighbors,
either. Idenix, which develops drugs for viral and infectious diseases, wants to
increase its storage capacity of unknown solvents from 165 gallons to 2,000
gallons in its Hampshire Street facility. It’s a heck of an increase for any
chemical. The company says it isn’t required to make the information public; at
the same time, it’s seeking a license from the city to store 12 times the volume
of solvents it currently has. The reason? Homeland Security.

While we realize such sensitive information might be a risk to the public
safety, we think the risks of withholding that information would be even more
damaging. One unconfirmed chemical that neighbors have been tossing around as
one that could be in storage is dichloromethane, a known carcinogen commonly
used in pharmaceutical manufacturing. The company would neither confirm or deny
its existence at the site.
[...]

No comments: