September 15, 2007
Ethical Journalism?
Ethical Journalism?
Adam Reilly says "The safeguard [to remaining objective] is an abiding
sense of journalistic detachment [to ensure] reporting on reality, not
manipulating it." (ADAM REILLY, "House pest," Boston Phoenix, September 14,
2007, Page 14 News)
Undermining this argument are the daily doses of advocacy journalism
published by The New York Times and the Boston Globe. TV and radio outlets
regularly shape the news to fit journalists' own views, the views of the
publishers or the views of their advertisers. This objective "luxury of writing
with a strong point of view" was not applied to Peter Kenney and his colleague
citizen journalists. Kenny does not pretend to be objective. The Times and the
Globe do.
He says "there are" ethics taught in school but the courses usually omit
persons with disabilities (an issue for another time).
The dictionary says a journalist is a person whose occupation is
journalism. If a blogger is paid is he a journalist? There are many forms of
journalism.
One Boston Globe columnist told me that bloggers write opinion, they are
not reporters. He did not answer when I asked him if he is a blogger because he
writes opinion pieces. Nor did he reply to my query about video clips of public
events that "journalists" do not report or how a video blog is opinion.
In Manufacturing Consent Noam Chomsky showed how the number of column
inches varied according to the priorities of the editors of the New York Times.
Many stories do not appear in print or over the airwaves. Kenny refers to this
as "an accommodation."
Is there a growing source of indignation that professional journalists are
missing stories (or not reporting stories) that are being exposed by citizen
journalists like Matt Drudge used to be and Peter Kenney? Is Reilly objective
about bloggers?
--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
PO Box 400297
Cambridge MA 02140 USA
http://enoughroom.blogspot.com
http://enoughroomvideo.blogspot.com
House pest
One Cape Cod blogger is getting the scoops and setting the pace for
Massachusetts casino coverage — for better or worse
By: ADAM REILLY
9/12/2007 4:08:31 PM
FLY OFF THE HANDLE: Peter Kenney’s scoops jeopardized the future of casino
gambling in Massachusetts.
The biggest political story in Massachusetts right now is the state’s ongoing
dalliance with casino gambling — but the biggest scoops haven’t been coming from
the Globe or the Herald. Their source, instead, has been Yarmouth resident Peter
Kenney, a/k/a the “Great Gadfly,” a sexagenarian carpenter and
public-access-cable star who writes for CapeCodToday.com.
On August 20, Kenney blogged that Glenn Marshall — the leader of the Mashpee
Wampanoag tribe, which received federal tribal recognition in February and
struck a casino deal with the town of Middleborough in July — had lied about his
military record. Marshall previously claimed he’d received a Silver Star for
service in Vietnam; in fact, Kenney noted, Marshall’s name wasn’t listed on a
Web site that tracks Silver Star recipients. Two days later, in an addendum to
his original post, Kenney reported that Marshall’s three Purple Hearts were
fabrications, too. Then, on August 23, Kenney produced his most damning piece
yet — revealing, among other things, that Marshall had been convicted of rape in
1981.
These exclusives have already thrown the Mashpee Wampanoags into disarray.
Marshall stepped down as the tribe’s chairman on August 24, the same day that
the Cape Cod Times reported on his rape conviction and sundry fabrications; he
also copped to additional transgressions, including an arrest for cocaine
possession. Now, two long-time Marshall opponents — the mother-son team of
Amelia and Steven Bingham — are vying with Shawn Hendricks, Marshall’s successor
and ally, for tribal control. But the implications of Kenney’s reportage are
much, much bigger. Without Marshall calling the shots, the tribe might try to
build a casino on the Cape instead of in Middleborough — or (Kenney’s personal
preference) decide not to build one at all. What’s more, Governor Deval Patrick
is still weighing whether or not to support casino gambling. Marshall’s
implosion and the chaos it created could help convince the governor to take a
pass.
[. . .]
Kenney is very good at what he
does. But he’s right: he’s not a journalist.
Adam Reilly says "The safeguard [to remaining objective] is an abiding
sense of journalistic detachment [to ensure] reporting on reality, not
manipulating it." (ADAM REILLY, "House pest," Boston Phoenix, September 14,
2007, Page 14 News)
Undermining this argument are the daily doses of advocacy journalism
published by The New York Times and the Boston Globe. TV and radio outlets
regularly shape the news to fit journalists' own views, the views of the
publishers or the views of their advertisers. This objective "luxury of writing
with a strong point of view" was not applied to Peter Kenney and his colleague
citizen journalists. Kenny does not pretend to be objective. The Times and the
Globe do.
He says "there are" ethics taught in school but the courses usually omit
persons with disabilities (an issue for another time).
The dictionary says a journalist is a person whose occupation is
journalism. If a blogger is paid is he a journalist? There are many forms of
journalism.
One Boston Globe columnist told me that bloggers write opinion, they are
not reporters. He did not answer when I asked him if he is a blogger because he
writes opinion pieces. Nor did he reply to my query about video clips of public
events that "journalists" do not report or how a video blog is opinion.
In Manufacturing Consent Noam Chomsky showed how the number of column
inches varied according to the priorities of the editors of the New York Times.
Many stories do not appear in print or over the airwaves. Kenny refers to this
as "an accommodation."
Is there a growing source of indignation that professional journalists are
missing stories (or not reporting stories) that are being exposed by citizen
journalists like Matt Drudge used to be and Peter Kenney? Is Reilly objective
about bloggers?
--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
PO Box 400297
Cambridge MA 02140 USA
http://enoughroom.blogspot.com
http://enoughroomvideo.blogspot.com
House pest
One Cape Cod blogger is getting the scoops and setting the pace for
Massachusetts casino coverage — for better or worse
By: ADAM REILLY
9/12/2007 4:08:31 PM
FLY OFF THE HANDLE: Peter Kenney’s scoops jeopardized the future of casino
gambling in Massachusetts.
The biggest political story in Massachusetts right now is the state’s ongoing
dalliance with casino gambling — but the biggest scoops haven’t been coming from
the Globe or the Herald. Their source, instead, has been Yarmouth resident Peter
Kenney, a/k/a the “Great Gadfly,” a sexagenarian carpenter and
public-access-cable star who writes for CapeCodToday.com.
On August 20, Kenney blogged that Glenn Marshall — the leader of the Mashpee
Wampanoag tribe, which received federal tribal recognition in February and
struck a casino deal with the town of Middleborough in July — had lied about his
military record. Marshall previously claimed he’d received a Silver Star for
service in Vietnam; in fact, Kenney noted, Marshall’s name wasn’t listed on a
Web site that tracks Silver Star recipients. Two days later, in an addendum to
his original post, Kenney reported that Marshall’s three Purple Hearts were
fabrications, too. Then, on August 23, Kenney produced his most damning piece
yet — revealing, among other things, that Marshall had been convicted of rape in
1981.
These exclusives have already thrown the Mashpee Wampanoags into disarray.
Marshall stepped down as the tribe’s chairman on August 24, the same day that
the Cape Cod Times reported on his rape conviction and sundry fabrications; he
also copped to additional transgressions, including an arrest for cocaine
possession. Now, two long-time Marshall opponents — the mother-son team of
Amelia and Steven Bingham — are vying with Shawn Hendricks, Marshall’s successor
and ally, for tribal control. But the implications of Kenney’s reportage are
much, much bigger. Without Marshall calling the shots, the tribe might try to
build a casino on the Cape instead of in Middleborough — or (Kenney’s personal
preference) decide not to build one at all. What’s more, Governor Deval Patrick
is still weighing whether or not to support casino gambling. Marshall’s
implosion and the chaos it created could help convince the governor to take a
pass.
[. . .]
Kenney is very good at what he
does. But he’s right: he’s not a journalist.
Labels:
Bloggers,
Boston Journalism,
Glenn Marshall,
Mass Casinos,
Peter Kenney
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment