Showing posts with label Health Department. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Department. Show all posts

October 26, 2014

Quarantine Restrictions Rasie Concerns of Those Quarantined





Sounds like NJ Gov. Christie is acting responsibly. Here's one more example of a dumbed down population, journalists and political class. Under the MA state constitution the Commissioner of Health can take a person into custody with no due process and isolate the person to protect the public health. That is what Christie is doing in NJ. Don't know what other state constitutions say but this is something that elected officials and voters should know. It is certainly an inconvenience. But it is more of an inconvenience if they spread deadly viruses.

[From article]
The restrictions imposed on health workers returning from Africa exposes a dilemma for authorities who are keen for American experts to help staunch the disease in Africa but mindful of public concerns at home.
[. . .]
The New Jersey department of health said Hickox would remain in isolation for the time being. Speaking on Friday, Christie said the state’s health department had determined a quarantine order should be issued; it was not clear on Saturday if it would be issued in New York, where Hickox was traveling to, or New Jersey, where she is in hospital. Hickox is not from the area, Christie said.
Civil liberties activists raised concerns about the constitutionality of the new rules, warning they could discourage health workers from volunteering to fight Ebola in Africa.
[. . .]
The restrictions imposed by New York, New Jersey and Illinois go beyond recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the agency managing the federal response to Ebola in the US. The CDC said in a statement that it “sets the baseline recommended standards, but state and local officials have the prerogative to tighten the regimen as they see fit”.
[. . .]
The new guidelines will require anyone who flies from Liberia, Sierra Leone or Guinea ­– regardless of whether they are exhibiting symptoms ­– to check in daily with state and local health officials. They will be required to report their temperatures and the any appearance of Ebola-like symptoms, such as severe headaches, fatigue and diarrhoea. They will also be required to consult with health officials if they need, or want, to travel.
If an affected individual fails to check in, the CDC said health officials would take immediate action to track the person down and ensure the proper monitoring is carried out. Concern has been raised over the feasibility of such proposed action.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/25/obama-facts-not-fear-public-response-ebola-usa

Ebola nurse 'made to feel like criminal' on return to US
• Kaci Hickox tests negative but stays in New Jersey isolation
• ACLU raises concerns over ‘abuse of police powers’
• WHO: Ebola cases pass 10,000 mark
• NY and NJ introduce tough new quarantine measures
Lauren Gambino in New York
follow @LGamGam
Follow @GuardianUS
theguardian.com
Saturday 25 October 2014 16.41 EDT

September 26, 2011

Improper Asbestos Removal in Cambridge

A few months ago asbestos was removed from the flooring of a Harvard-owned building in Cambridge. Harvard did not tell the tenants that they were removing it during renovations. On one day the workers in a hall were working with no protection for tenants. I complained to the Cambridge Health Department, the state EPA and the US EPA. City sent inspectors who left their cards in my mail box, but I did not speak with either of them. The state said it sent an official but I never heard any more. I do not know what company did the work.

Riley uses the phrase "there is no evidence that her company's projects pose health risks to the public today." That is not reassuring. That does not mean there was or is none. It is the phrase used by PR flacks and lawyers.

Also the phrase "there are safeguards to prevent it from being a major release,"
What about a minor release? What are the standards for harm?

What is the complete history of their work sites and what are the requirements for occupied multiple residences?

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x981213918/Improper-asbestos-firm-worked-on-4-projects-in-Cambridge#axzz1Z5w9oEM9

Improper Asbestos Firm Worked on Four Projects in Cambridge
By David Riley
Cambridge Chronicle
Posted Sep 26, 2011 @ 02:52 PM