Ennis says, Ziegler's documentary "alleges the media's broad infatuation with Obama." The film provides evidence, which Ennis can't see. Ennis adds, "no authorities [are] interviewed on media bias." Experts give their opinions usually refuted by other experts. Is Ennis unable to use logic? Ennis demands proof of a conspiracy. Editors and anchors use media access to broadcast propaganda not facts. Ziegler agrees with Ann Coulter in "Guilty," and Bernard Goldberg in "Slobbering Love Affair." They cite facts which Ennis cannot see. Ennis asks, "How can you say the media is horribly biased and wrong [. . .] then cite other clips to support your argument [. . .] from the same sources you just discredited?" Journalists distort facts then admit they distort facts. That is why one cites discredited media, for people (like Ennis) who do not accept facts. Ennis says, "Ziegler singles out Obama [. . .] as a first-term senator without any major legislative accomplishments, then does not hold Palin to the same standard[. . .]." That was not the argument. Obama had no executive or decision-making experience. It shows as he stumbles his way through the economic crisis. Sarah Palin has executive experience leading the largest state in the union and as a Mayor. Obama is speaker without substance or consistency. This shows as he promotes himself on media instead of solving the problems he was elected to solve.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-wellington-ennis/review-sarah-palins-makeo_b_179158.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/ctd53g
John Wellington Ennis
Filmmaker, Activist, Some Dude
Posted March 27, 2009 | 04:31 PM (EST)
REVIEW: Sarah Palin's Makeover in Media Malpractice
Huffington Post
No comments:
Post a Comment