April 29, 2007
The Right to Travel, Persons with Disabilities
The Right to Travel, Persons with Disabilities
The group with the most compelling interest in removing cobblestones
remains silent. (JENNIFER FERMINO, "BLOCK ON THE 'ROCKS,'" New York Post, July 25, 2006, Page 21) Persons with mobility impairments have a constitutional right to travel.
Cobblestone streets are a barrier to the enjoyment of that right.
Roger Byrom's comment, "If you don't like cobblestones in TriBeCa, live on
the Upper West Side," shows he is unaware of the requirement of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which applies to public sidewalks in New York City.
The city gets U.S. taxpayer funds. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
makes it a civil rights issue. Would Byrom as easily deny to persons of color or
homosexuals the right to use the TriBeCa sidewalks?
Why did the New York Post omit persons with disabilities from commenting on
this issue? Why do the rights of persons with disabilities seldom enter the
minds of journalists? This is a shameful display of ignorance and bigotry by
city activists and journalists.
--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA
BLOCK ON THE 'ROCKS'
New York Post
By JENNIFER FERMINO
July 25, 2006 -- A downtown fight over the landmarked streets of TriBeCa has
pitted stroller-pushing moms against hardened preservationists.
Residents of 44 Laight St. - a converted factory where condo lofts go for $5
million a pop - say they're tired of traipsing along the jagged cobblestones
outside their building.
[...]
The group with the most compelling interest in removing cobblestones
remains silent. (JENNIFER FERMINO, "BLOCK ON THE 'ROCKS,'" New York Post, July 25, 2006, Page 21) Persons with mobility impairments have a constitutional right to travel.
Cobblestone streets are a barrier to the enjoyment of that right.
Roger Byrom's comment, "If you don't like cobblestones in TriBeCa, live on
the Upper West Side," shows he is unaware of the requirement of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which applies to public sidewalks in New York City.
The city gets U.S. taxpayer funds. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
makes it a civil rights issue. Would Byrom as easily deny to persons of color or
homosexuals the right to use the TriBeCa sidewalks?
Why did the New York Post omit persons with disabilities from commenting on
this issue? Why do the rights of persons with disabilities seldom enter the
minds of journalists? This is a shameful display of ignorance and bigotry by
city activists and journalists.
--
Roy Bercaw, Editor
ENOUGH ROOM
Cambridge MA USA
BLOCK ON THE 'ROCKS'
New York Post
By JENNIFER FERMINO
July 25, 2006 -- A downtown fight over the landmarked streets of TriBeCa has
pitted stroller-pushing moms against hardened preservationists.
Residents of 44 Laight St. - a converted factory where condo lofts go for $5
million a pop - say they're tired of traipsing along the jagged cobblestones
outside their building.
[...]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment