[From article]
Atmospheric scientists do not understand a natural mechanism in their subject matter – and weren’t even aware of the existence of this phenomenon until 25 years ago.
And yet we are expected to believe that the science of the atmosphere is so settled that we can take as certainty that the climate a hundred years from now will be changed by an increase in a tiny component of the atmosphere, CO2.
This is hubris on steroids. Anyone using the expression “settled science” in a field that can’t account for a natural phenomenon is guilty of overstatement at least, and maybe even fraud.
http://americanthinker.com/blog/2014/09/settled_science_and_sprites.html
September 29, 2014
'Settled science' and sprites
By Thomas Lifson
No comments:
Post a Comment